Ignore itlb in grafana instead
All checks were successful
Tests / Clang total: 2500, passed: 2500
Clang |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend |:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-: |0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / Debug total: 2498, passed: 2498
Tests / SIMD fallback total: 2500, passed: 2500
Tests / Release [gcc] total: 2500, passed: 2500
GNU C Compiler (gcc) |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend |:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-: |0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / Release [gcc,aarch64] total: 1867, passed: 1867
Tests / Coverage total: 1877, passed: 1877
Code Coverage #### Project Overview No changes detected, that affect the code coverage. * Line Coverage: 99.29% (1829/1842) * Branch Coverage: 67.35% (1479/2196) * Complexity Density: 0.00 * Lines of Code: 1842 #### Quality Gates Summary Output truncated.
weaselab/conflict-set/pipeline/head This commit looks good

This commit is contained in:
2024-08-16 15:36:25 -07:00
parent 159f2eef74
commit 3a5b86ed9e

View File

@@ -257,8 +257,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_L1I, "l1i"},
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_LL, "ll"},
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_DTLB, "dtlb"},
// Somehow was showing a miss rate > 1 /shrug
// {PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_ITLB, "itlb"},
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_ITLB, "itlb"},
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_BPU, "bpu"},
{PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_NODE, "node"},
}) {