Tweaks and add more planned sections
All checks were successful
Tests / Clang total: 1096, passed: 1096
Clang |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend
|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:
|0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / SIMD fallback total: 1096, passed: 1096
Tests / Release [gcc] total: 1096, passed: 1096
GNU C Compiler (gcc) |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend
|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:
|0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / Release [gcc,aarch64] total: 824, passed: 824
Tests / Coverage total: 823, passed: 823
weaselab/conflict-set/pipeline/head This commit looks good
All checks were successful
Tests / Clang total: 1096, passed: 1096
Clang |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend
|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:
|0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / SIMD fallback total: 1096, passed: 1096
Tests / Release [gcc] total: 1096, passed: 1096
GNU C Compiler (gcc) |Total|New|Outstanding|Fixed|Trend
|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:
|0|0|0|0|:clap:
Tests / Release [gcc,aarch64] total: 824, passed: 824
Tests / Coverage total: 823, passed: 823
weaselab/conflict-set/pipeline/head This commit looks good
This commit is contained in:
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ template <class NodeT> int getChildGeqSimd(NodeT *self, int child) {
|
||||
|
||||
// cachegrind says the plain loop is fewer instructions and more mis-predicted
|
||||
// branches. Microbenchmark says plain loop is faster. It's written in this
|
||||
// weird "generic" way though in case someday we can use the simd
|
||||
// weird "generic" way though so that someday we can use the simd
|
||||
// implementation easily if we want.
|
||||
if constexpr (std::is_same_v<NodeT, Node3>) {
|
||||
Node3 *n = (Node3 *)self;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user