Add to corpus

README.md

@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ A data structure for optimistic concurrency control on ranges of bitwise-lexicog
 
 Intended as an alternative to FoundationDB's skip list.
 
-Hardware for all benchmarks is an AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-34-34-89 1.35V RAM
+Hardware for all benchmarks is an AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-34-34-89 1.35V RAM.
+
+Compiler is `Ubuntu clang version 20.0.0 (++20241029082144+7544d3af0e28-1~exp1~20241029082307.506)`.
 
 # Microbenchmark
 
@@ -10,29 +12,29 @@ Hardware for all benchmarks is an AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-3
 
 |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |          ins/op |          cyc/op |    IPC |         bra/op |   miss% |     total | benchmark
 |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
-|              172.03 |        5,812,791.77 |    0.4% |        3,130.62 |          879.00 |  3.562 |         509.23 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `point reads`
-|              167.44 |        5,972,130.71 |    0.2% |        3,065.14 |          862.27 |  3.555 |         494.30 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `prefix reads`
-|              238.77 |        4,188,130.84 |    0.9% |        3,589.93 |        1,259.30 |  2.851 |         637.12 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `range reads`
-|              424.01 |        2,358,426.70 |    0.2% |        5,620.05 |        2,242.35 |  2.506 |         854.80 |    1.7% |      0.01 | `point writes`
-|              418.45 |        2,389,780.56 |    0.4% |        5,525.07 |        2,211.05 |  2.499 |         831.71 |    1.7% |      0.01 | `prefix writes`
-|              254.87 |        3,923,568.88 |    2.6% |        3,187.01 |        1,366.50 |  2.332 |         529.11 |    2.7% |      0.02 | `range writes`
-|              675.96 |        1,479,374.50 |    3.3% |        7,735.41 |        3,468.60 |  2.230 |       1,386.02 |    1.8% |      0.01 | `monotonic increasing point writes`
-|          137,986.20 |            7,247.10 |    0.6% |      789,752.33 |      699,462.00 |  1.129 |     144,824.14 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `worst case for radix tree`
-|               21.63 |       46,231,564.03 |    1.0% |          448.00 |          107.14 |  4.181 |          84.00 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `create and destroy`
+|              159.65 |        6,263,576.52 |    1.6% |        2,972.36 |          820.37 |  3.623 |         504.59 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `point reads`
+|              156.32 |        6,397,320.65 |    0.7% |        2,913.62 |          806.87 |  3.611 |         490.19 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `prefix reads`
+|              229.18 |        4,363,293.65 |    1.2% |        3,541.05 |        1,219.75 |  2.903 |         629.33 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `range reads`
+|              363.37 |        2,752,026.30 |    0.3% |        5,273.63 |        1,951.54 |  2.702 |         851.66 |    1.7% |      0.01 | `point writes`
+|              364.99 |        2,739,787.02 |    0.3% |        5,250.92 |        1,958.54 |  2.681 |         839.24 |    1.7% |      0.01 | `prefix writes`
+|              242.26 |        4,127,796.58 |    2.9% |        3,117.33 |        1,304.41 |  2.390 |         541.07 |    2.8% |      0.02 | `range writes`
+|              562.48 |        1,777,855.27 |    0.8% |        7,305.21 |        3,034.34 |  2.408 |       1,329.30 |    1.3% |      0.01 | `monotonic increasing point writes`
+|          122,688.57 |            8,150.72 |    0.7% |      798,766.00 |      666,842.00 |  1.198 |     144,584.50 |    0.1% |      0.01 | `worst case for radix tree`
+|               41.71 |       23,976,459.34 |    1.7% |          885.00 |          219.17 |  4.038 |         132.00 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `create and destroy`
 
 ## Radix tree (this implementation)
 
 |               ns/op |                op/s |    err% |          ins/op |          cyc/op |    IPC |         bra/op |   miss% |     total | benchmark
 |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
-|               12.88 |       77,653,350.77 |    0.5% |          185.37 |           64.45 |  2.876 |          41.51 |    0.4% |      0.01 | `point reads`
-|               14.67 |       68,179,354.49 |    0.1% |          271.44 |           73.40 |  3.698 |          53.70 |    0.3% |      0.01 | `prefix reads`
-|               34.84 |       28,701,444.36 |    0.3% |          715.74 |          175.27 |  4.084 |         127.30 |    0.2% |      0.01 | `range reads`
-|               17.12 |       58,422,988.28 |    0.2% |          314.30 |           86.11 |  3.650 |          39.82 |    0.4% |      0.01 | `point writes`
-|               31.42 |       31,830,804.65 |    0.1% |          591.06 |          158.07 |  3.739 |          82.67 |    0.2% |      0.01 | `prefix writes`
-|               37.37 |       26,759,432.70 |    2.2% |          681.98 |          188.95 |  3.609 |          96.10 |    0.1% |      0.01 | `range writes`
-|               76.72 |       13,035,140.63 |    2.3% |        1,421.28 |          387.17 |  3.671 |         257.76 |    0.1% |      0.01 | `monotonic increasing point writes`
-|          297,452.00 |            3,361.89 |    0.9% |    3,508,083.00 |    1,500,834.67 |  2.337 |     727,525.33 |    0.1% |      0.01 | `worst case for radix tree`
-|               87.70 |       11,402,490.60 |    1.0% |        1,795.00 |          442.09 |  4.060 |         297.00 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `create and destroy`
+|               12.63 |       79,186,868.18 |    1.4% |          241.61 |           64.76 |  3.731 |          31.64 |    0.8% |      0.01 | `point reads`
+|               14.48 |       69,078,073.40 |    0.3% |          292.42 |           74.69 |  3.915 |          41.49 |    0.5% |      0.01 | `prefix reads`
+|               34.37 |       29,094,694.11 |    0.2% |          759.53 |          179.77 |  4.225 |         100.38 |    0.2% |      0.01 | `range reads`
+|               19.34 |       51,713,896.36 |    0.7% |          369.70 |          101.81 |  3.631 |          47.88 |    0.6% |      0.01 | `point writes`
+|               39.16 |       25,538,968.61 |    0.2% |          653.16 |          206.77 |  3.159 |          89.62 |    0.8% |      0.01 | `prefix writes`
+|               40.58 |       24,642,681.12 |    4.7% |          718.44 |          216.44 |  3.319 |          99.28 |    0.6% |      0.01 | `range writes`
+|               78.77 |       12,694,520.69 |    3.8% |        1,395.55 |          421.73 |  3.309 |         249.81 |    0.1% |      0.01 | `monotonic increasing point writes`
+|          287,760.50 |            3,475.11 |    0.5% |    3,929,266.50 |    1,550,225.50 |  2.535 |     639,064.00 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `worst case for radix tree`
+|              104.76 |        9,545,250.65 |    3.1% |        2,000.00 |          552.82 |  3.618 |         342.00 |    0.0% |      0.01 | `create and destroy`
 
 # "Real data" test
 
@@ -41,13 +43,13 @@ Point queries only, best of three runs. Gc ratio is the ratio of time spent doin
 ## skip list
 
 ```
-Check: 4.47891 seconds, 364.05 MB/s, Add: 4.55599 seconds, 123.058 MB/s, Gc ratio: 37.1145%
+Check: 4.39702 seconds, 370.83 MB/s, Add: 4.50025 seconds, 124.583 MB/s, Gc ratio: 29.1333%, Peak idle memory: 5.51852e+06
 ```
 
 ## radix tree
 
 ```
-Check: 0.953012 seconds, 1710.94 MB/s, Add: 1.30025 seconds, 431.188 MB/s, Gc ratio: 43.9816%, Peak idle memory: 2.28375e+06
+Check: 0.969055 seconds, 1682.62 MB/s, Add: 1.20279 seconds, 466.127 MB/s, Gc ratio: 44.5029%, Peak idle memory: 2.29297e+06
 ```
 
 ## hash table
@@ -55,5 +57,5 @@ Check: 0.953012 seconds, 1710.94 MB/s, Add: 1.30025 seconds, 431.188 MB/s, Gc ra
 (The hash table implementation doesn't work on range queries, and its purpose is to provide an idea of how fast point queries can be)
 
 ```
-Check: 0.804094 seconds, 2027.81 MB/s, Add: 0.652952 seconds, 858.645 MB/s, Gc ratio: 35.3885%
+Check: 0.84256 seconds, 1935.23 MB/s, Add: 0.697204 seconds, 804.146 MB/s, Gc ratio: 35.4091%
 ```