weaselbot
494e836aae
CI / pre-commit (pull_request) Successful in 2m9s
CI / release (arm64, ubuntu-latest-arm64) (pull_request) Successful in 3m27s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug, debug) (pull_request) Successful in 3m38s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DUSE_64_BIT=1, 64-bit-versions) (pull_request) Successful in 3m29s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++, gcc) (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
CI / test (-DUSE_SIMD_FALLBACK=ON, simd-fallback) (pull_request) Successful in 3m33s
CI / release (amd64, ubuntu-latest-amd64) (pull_request) Successful in 4m55s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 3m40s
Per review feedback on the i > 0 memcmp guard: handle empty keys up front instead, so memcmp only runs when both keys are non-empty (and therefore have valid data pointers). An empty key is a prefix of every key, so it sorts before any non-empty key; when both are empty, fall back to the extra ordering. This makes the empty-vs-non-empty case explicit rather than relying on the length check after a defaulted c = 0.
A data structure for optimistic concurrency control on ranges of bitwise-lexicographically-ordered keys.
Intended as an alternative to FoundationDB's skip list.
Hardware for all benchmarks is an AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-34-34-89 1.35V RAM.
$ clang++ --version
Ubuntu clang version 20.0.0 (++20241120082228+86734c857724-1~exp1~20241120202359.554)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-20/bin
Microbenchmark
Skip list
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161.29 | 6,200,056.17 | 0.1% | 3,014.03 | 831.04 | 3.627 | 504.59 | 0.0% | 1.93 | point reads |
| 158.32 | 6,316,160.64 | 0.1% | 2,954.16 | 815.80 | 3.621 | 490.17 | 0.0% | 1.89 | prefix reads |
| 237.39 | 4,212,409.50 | 0.2% | 3,592.41 | 1,233.96 | 2.911 | 629.31 | 0.0% | 2.84 | range reads |
| 442.11 | 2,261,878.94 | 0.0% | 4,450.57 | 2,314.25 | 1.923 | 707.92 | 2.1% | 5.28 | point writes |
| 439.89 | 2,273,308.53 | 0.1% | 4,410.22 | 2,302.29 | 1.916 | 694.74 | 2.1% | 5.25 | prefix writes |
| 290.96 | 3,436,936.78 | 0.0% | 2,315.38 | 1,528.68 | 1.515 | 396.69 | 3.3% | 3.49 | range writes |
| 476.93 | 2,096,762.02 | 0.6% | 6,999.33 | 2,484.94 | 2.817 | 1,251.73 | 1.3% | 0.06 | monotonic increasing point writes |
| 131,736.57 | 7,590.91 | 1.1% | 807,444.50 | 704,941.71 | 1.145 | 144,584.60 | 0.9% | 0.01 | worst case for radix tree |
| 45.50 | 21,978,369.95 | 1.1% | 902.00 | 232.36 | 3.882 | 132.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | create and destroy |
Radix tree (this implementation)
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.36 | 80,885,626.43 | 0.2% | 243.56 | 63.62 | 3.828 | 31.07 | 0.6% | 0.15 | point reads |
| 14.18 | 70,502,196.81 | 0.1% | 297.72 | 73.13 | 4.071 | 40.31 | 0.5% | 0.17 | prefix reads |
| 33.44 | 29,901,623.04 | 0.1% | 767.90 | 172.42 | 4.454 | 101.32 | 0.2% | 0.40 | range reads |
| 19.48 | 51,342,564.70 | 0.3% | 374.45 | 100.43 | 3.728 | 48.92 | 0.5% | 0.23 | point writes |
| 37.46 | 26,694,471.44 | 0.1% | 672.00 | 193.14 | 3.479 | 101.28 | 0.3% | 0.45 | prefix writes |
| 38.78 | 25,784,784.34 | 0.0% | 738.26 | 199.93 | 3.693 | 111.59 | 0.1% | 0.47 | range writes |
| 76.05 | 13,148,995.74 | 0.7% | 1,450.77 | 397.16 | 3.653 | 275.72 | 0.0% | 0.01 | monotonic increasing point writes |
| 286,920.33 | 3,485.29 | 0.4% | 4,117,948.00 | 1,521,352.00 | 2.707 | 714,833.00 | 0.1% | 0.01 | worst case for radix tree |
| 95.66 | 10,453,798.72 | 0.5% | 1,986.00 | 495.04 | 4.012 | 315.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | create and destroy |
"Real data" test
Point queries only. Gc ratio is the ratio of time spent doing garbage collection to time spent adding writes or doing garbage collection. Lower is better.
skip list
Check: 4.53508 seconds, 371.81 MB/s, Add: 3.81222 seconds, 150.919 MB/s, Gc ratio: 33.66%, Peak idle memory: 5.61007e+06
radix tree
Check: 0.957735 seconds, 1760.6 MB/s, Add: 1.19942 seconds, 479.678 MB/s, Gc ratio: 38.6069%, Peak idle memory: 2.05667e+06
hash table
(The hash table implementation doesn't work on range queries, and its purpose is to provide an idea of how fast point queries can be)
Check: 0.804598 seconds, 2095.69 MB/s, Add: 0.671221 seconds, 857.147 MB/s, Gc ratio: 35.0034%, Peak idle memory: 0