weaselbot
dee3a8f640
CI / release (arm64, ubuntu-latest-arm64) (pull_request) Successful in 3m25s
CI / pre-commit (pull_request) Successful in 3m40s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug, debug) (pull_request) Successful in 5m8s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DUSE_64_BIT=1, 64-bit-versions) (pull_request) Successful in 4m50s
CI / test (-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++, gcc) (pull_request) Successful in 4m57s
CI / test (-DUSE_SIMD_FALLBACK=ON, simd-fallback) (pull_request) Successful in 4m42s
CI / release (amd64, ubuntu-latest-amd64) (pull_request) Successful in 6m31s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 4m51s
The hash_table implementation cannot accurately track memory usage and was returning -1 from ConflictSet::getBytes() and ConflictSet_getBytes(). That violates the API contract that getBytes() returns a non-negative byte count. Change both entry points to return 0 and document in ConflictSet.h that implementations which do not track memory usage may return 0. Add a regression test in test_conflict_set.py that loads the hash_table implementation and verifies getBytes() is non-negative. Closes #62
A data structure for optimistic concurrency control on ranges of bitwise-lexicographically-ordered keys.
Intended as an alternative to FoundationDB's skip list.
Hardware for all benchmarks is an AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with (2x32GB) 5600MT/s CL28-34-34-89 1.35V RAM.
$ clang++ --version
Ubuntu clang version 20.0.0 (++20241120082228+86734c857724-1~exp1~20241120202359.554)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-20/bin
Microbenchmark
Skip list
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161.29 | 6,200,056.17 | 0.1% | 3,014.03 | 831.04 | 3.627 | 504.59 | 0.0% | 1.93 | point reads |
| 158.32 | 6,316,160.64 | 0.1% | 2,954.16 | 815.80 | 3.621 | 490.17 | 0.0% | 1.89 | prefix reads |
| 237.39 | 4,212,409.50 | 0.2% | 3,592.41 | 1,233.96 | 2.911 | 629.31 | 0.0% | 2.84 | range reads |
| 442.11 | 2,261,878.94 | 0.0% | 4,450.57 | 2,314.25 | 1.923 | 707.92 | 2.1% | 5.28 | point writes |
| 439.89 | 2,273,308.53 | 0.1% | 4,410.22 | 2,302.29 | 1.916 | 694.74 | 2.1% | 5.25 | prefix writes |
| 290.96 | 3,436,936.78 | 0.0% | 2,315.38 | 1,528.68 | 1.515 | 396.69 | 3.3% | 3.49 | range writes |
| 476.93 | 2,096,762.02 | 0.6% | 6,999.33 | 2,484.94 | 2.817 | 1,251.73 | 1.3% | 0.06 | monotonic increasing point writes |
| 131,736.57 | 7,590.91 | 1.1% | 807,444.50 | 704,941.71 | 1.145 | 144,584.60 | 0.9% | 0.01 | worst case for radix tree |
| 45.50 | 21,978,369.95 | 1.1% | 902.00 | 232.36 | 3.882 | 132.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | create and destroy |
Radix tree (this implementation)
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.36 | 80,885,626.43 | 0.2% | 243.56 | 63.62 | 3.828 | 31.07 | 0.6% | 0.15 | point reads |
| 14.18 | 70,502,196.81 | 0.1% | 297.72 | 73.13 | 4.071 | 40.31 | 0.5% | 0.17 | prefix reads |
| 33.44 | 29,901,623.04 | 0.1% | 767.90 | 172.42 | 4.454 | 101.32 | 0.2% | 0.40 | range reads |
| 19.48 | 51,342,564.70 | 0.3% | 374.45 | 100.43 | 3.728 | 48.92 | 0.5% | 0.23 | point writes |
| 37.46 | 26,694,471.44 | 0.1% | 672.00 | 193.14 | 3.479 | 101.28 | 0.3% | 0.45 | prefix writes |
| 38.78 | 25,784,784.34 | 0.0% | 738.26 | 199.93 | 3.693 | 111.59 | 0.1% | 0.47 | range writes |
| 76.05 | 13,148,995.74 | 0.7% | 1,450.77 | 397.16 | 3.653 | 275.72 | 0.0% | 0.01 | monotonic increasing point writes |
| 286,920.33 | 3,485.29 | 0.4% | 4,117,948.00 | 1,521,352.00 | 2.707 | 714,833.00 | 0.1% | 0.01 | worst case for radix tree |
| 95.66 | 10,453,798.72 | 0.5% | 1,986.00 | 495.04 | 4.012 | 315.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | create and destroy |
"Real data" test
Point queries only. Gc ratio is the ratio of time spent doing garbage collection to time spent adding writes or doing garbage collection. Lower is better.
skip list
Check: 4.53508 seconds, 371.81 MB/s, Add: 3.81222 seconds, 150.919 MB/s, Gc ratio: 33.66%, Peak idle memory: 5.61007e+06
radix tree
Check: 0.957735 seconds, 1760.6 MB/s, Add: 1.19942 seconds, 479.678 MB/s, Gc ratio: 38.6069%, Peak idle memory: 2.05667e+06
hash table
(The hash table implementation doesn't work on range queries, and its purpose is to provide an idea of how fast point queries can be)
Check: 0.804598 seconds, 2095.69 MB/s, Add: 0.671221 seconds, 857.147 MB/s, Gc ratio: 35.0034%, Peak idle memory: 0